Re: TeX Licenses & teTeX (Was: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia)

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@latex-project.org> writes:

> the problem with Don's work is, that you have to make assumptions or raise
> opinions on what he means. but assuming he clarifies or you pick an
> interpretation it then needs a discussion on whether it fits the not
> completely unambiguous, interpretable, non-legalistic DFSG. right?

I think there is actually no problem with Knuth's work.  The LPPL,
however, does *not* describe the Knuth "license" at all.  It's a very
very different document.

Nothing in the Knuth "license" speaks of renaming filenames.