Re: TeX Licenses & teTeX (Was: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia)
Frank Mittelbach <email@example.com> writes:
> the problem with Don's work is, that you have to make assumptions or raise
> opinions on what he means. but assuming he clarifies or you pick an
> interpretation it then needs a discussion on whether it fits the not
> completely unambiguous, interpretable, non-legalistic DFSG. right?
I think there is actually no problem with Knuth's work. The LPPL,
however, does *not* describe the Knuth "license" at all. It's a very
very different document.
Nothing in the Knuth "license" speaks of renaming filenames.