On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 07:53, Peter Makholm wrote: > That is as long the license doesn't make any non-free restrictions for > anyone it is acceptable to give more freedom to some people. Good. Because, as I said, that would of made a very weird case of something being non-DFSG-free.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part