On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > Does it mean that you would actually agree on removing GFDL covered manuals > with invariant sections from Debian? Keep in mind that even I don't advocate that if the manual has no Invariant Sections. The new GFDL draft is quite interesting and appears to have motivated at least in part by the discussion thread(s) that involved this mailing list, Thomas Bushnell, RMS, and myself. Last I checked, however, the diff that the FSF posted was not correct; the actual draft contained new language not mentioned in the diff. This was probably an oversight. Hrm, now the diff isn't even available: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl-1.1-to-1.2-draft.diff Not Found! HTTP Error 404 Your requested URL /copyleft/fdl-1.1-to-1.2-draft.diff was not found on this webserver. I clicked on the link from http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html#SEC2. RMS, can you ask someone to look into this, please? -- G. Branden Robinson | One man's "magic" is another man's Debian GNU/Linux | engineering. "Supernatural" is a branden@debian.org | null word. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
pgpe7VRFEhRxz.pgp
Description: PGP signature