Re: could you safely rewrite the DFSG requirement?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:48:13AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Also, even if you consider documentation as software, there is
> > another obscure interpretational leap from there to considering
> > printed documentation as software.
> > I know many in the free softare community want it to be such, but this is by
> > no means a granted interpretation.
> People are of two minds about this. Some think that documentation
> should be a little looser. I think that that crowd (which once
> included me) is losing, as far as Debian is concerned.
Does it mean that you would actually agree on removing GFDL covered manuals
with invariant sections from Debian?
PS: many Cc: removed