[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: draft for new Vim license

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> What this means is that it is indirectly self-contradictory to say
> "You can distribute modified versions under the GPL but not the
> original version."

Ah, yes this is a good point often missed.

Another way to put it is that free software must permit the
distribution of modified versions, even versions with the null

Reply to: