Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
Scripsit Branden Robinson <email@example.com>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I don't need to defend whatever past decisions may have been made;
> > they quite possibly were simply incorrect.
> Unless, of course, they involved the GNU Emacs Manual, right? :-P
Please keep that flamewar in its appointed thread...
Henning Makholm "It was intended to compile from some approximation to
the M-notation, but the M-notation was never fully defined,
because representing LISP functions by LISP lists became the
dominant programming language when the interpreter later became available."