[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: One unclear point in the Vim license

Scripsit Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:

> > I don't need to defend whatever past decisions may have been made;
> > they quite possibly were simply incorrect.

> Unless, of course, they involved the GNU Emacs Manual, right?  :-P

Please keep that flamewar in its appointed thread...

Henning Makholm       "It was intended to compile from some approximation to
                 the M-notation, but the M-notation was never fully defined,
                because representing LISP functions by LISP lists became the
 dominant programming language when the interpreter later became available."

Reply to: