On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:05:11PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > And paintings are not sculpture, nor are they books, and the shape > of a SC Cobra is not the same as a photograph. Some visual works are > copyrightable, some aren't. Font designs strike me (a non-expert) as > something reasonable to copyright (apparently incorrectly). Sure. *How* you get the typeface output is algorithmic (and what is technically referred to as the font in digital typography). The output itself is not. > Hmmm, shades of the look-and-feel copyright argument. Okay, don't > bother looking up the actual reference, I was just confused. Okay. -- G. Branden Robinson | Don't use nuclear weapons to Debian GNU/Linux | troubleshoot faults. branden@debian.org | -- US Air Force Instruction 91-111 http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpyYeSFSEwnk.pgp
Description: PGP signature