[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: {debian-legal} Re: Final Draft: Interpretive Guideline regarding DFSG clause 3

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:40:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > I'm not seeing why you're suggesting things that you don't want.
> > I'm looking for compromise positions.  Is that a foreign concept?
> > Geez, I hope not.
> If you don't want it, how does it make sense as a "compromise"? 

I didn't say I don't want it.  Indeed, it would be the sort of
compromise I'd be happy to accept.  It would make me happy, and I was
guessing that it might make others happy.

It's not my *ideal*, but compromise is not about everybody stating
their ideal and then refusing to budge, so I'm trying not to do that.

Reply to: