Re: Cactvs-license

To: moth@debian.org
Cc: jbj@image.dk, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Cactvs-license
From: Walter Landry <landry@physics.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:25:40 -0700
Message-id: <20010918102540K.boo@physics.utah.edu>
In-reply-to: <1000779920.3d303cd4@debian.org>
References: <20010915165907.A17362@jbj2.jbj.danware.dk> <20010917144450M.boo@physics.utah.edu> <1000779920.3d303cd4@debian.org>

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:44:50PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > So, are there any other packages that specifically mention Debian?
> 
> ines.
> 
> crafty has something comparable.
> 
> But I'm not sure why an example is needed.  non-free is for
> software which we can legally distribute but which doesn't
> meet the DFSG.
> 
> -- 
> Raul

Ok.  I retract my concerns.  It is unclear to me whether someone is
allowed to mirror ines and crafty, but I guess we let the mirrors
worry about that.

Regards,
Walter Landry
landry@physics.utah.edu

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Cactvs-license
  - From: "Jakob B. Jensen" <jbj@image.dk>
- Re: Cactvs-license
  - From: Walter Landry <landry@physics.utah.edu>
- Re: Cactvs-license
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Adpcm code--is this licence free?
Next by Date: Re: RFC about copyrights and right package section for W3C docs.
Previous by thread: Re: Cactvs-license
Next by thread: Re: Cactvs-license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread