On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 01:27:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > That is not my problem. The package was rejected because of:
> >
> > |This package isn't under just the GPL as the copyright file says, but
> > |the GPL plus some very important exceptions.
> > |
> > |--
> > |James
> >
> [...]
> >
> > I wish a statement from James why the extra permissions make the package
> > unsuitable for Debian main.
>
> The way I read it, the rejection was just because the copyright
> file did not contain the full license.
I think the statement was unclear, but that would be a serious, if
easily fixable, problem.
sam th --- sam@uchicago.edu --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC --- http://samth.dyndns.org/key
DeCSS: http://samth.dynds.org/decss
Attachment:
pgpmC9OwTeZtM.pgp
Description: PGP signature