OPL
Is anybody can advise me if the OPL license
(http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml) is or isn't in compliance with DFSG?
I especially concerns about two following points:
...
a) You must cause the modified content to carry prominent notices
stating that you changed it, the exact nature and content of the
changes, and the date of any change.
b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
whole or in part contains or is derived from the OC or any part
thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties
under the terms of this License, unless otherwise permitted under
applicable Fair Use law.
...
Thanks,
Mariusz
--
Mariusz Przygodzki | Good judgement comes from experience.
dune@home.pl | Experience comes from bad judgement.
http://www.dune.home.pl |
GPG: 0x42FAD771 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OPL
- From: cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)
- Re: OPL
- From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>