Re: RTLinux patent

To: "debian-legal" <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RTLinux patent
From: Jens Müller <jens@unfaehig.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 010b01c0376f$7c76ec80$4df1e23e@enode>
References: <[🔎] m13kvlp-0012EwC@sucaba2.ieg.tu-clausthal.de> <[🔎] 20001015230907.F753@rano.org> <[🔎] 20001016002308.A25713@klomp.org> <[🔎] 20001016082345.A11400@daisy.vocalis.com> <[🔎] 20001016104414.A28311@klomp.org>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Wielaard" <mark@klomp.org>
To: "Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS" <edmundo@rano.org>
Cc: <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: RTLinux patent


> Yes, you are right. I was not completely sure.
> I was under the impression that software patents were only a real problem
> in the USA. But you are right. I looked at the packages in non-US and
> they seem to all contain cryptographic software.
Yes. RSA was the only patent case until now.

Jens

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RTLinux patent
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

References:
- RTLinux patent
  - From: andreas.franzen@ewetel.net
- Re: RTLinux patent
  - From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>
- Re: RTLinux patent
  - From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
- Re: RTLinux patent
  - From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>
- Re: RTLinux patent
  - From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RTLinux patent
Next by Date: Re: RTLinux patent
Previous by thread: Re: RTLinux patent
Next by thread: Re: RTLinux patent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread