Re: complete clone of the debian website
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 12:01:23PM -0400, Mike Bilow wrote:
> Yes, but it is not clear to me that this is a violation of the OPL. The
> problem is that the OPL is overwhelmingly concerned with, and written
> subject to the assumption that, it is protecting something equivalent to a
> book. This means that the main thrust of the protected material is the
> words and the _relevant_ illustrations.
The exact significance of this interpretation depends on the
technology used to display the text.
For example, hit "view source" under netscape, and you'll
see some rather interesting words.