debian-legal Jun 2000 by thread

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: complete clone of the debian website Wichert Akkerman

Re: complete clone of the debian website Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: complete clone of the debian website Mike Bilow

Re: complete clone of the debian website Peter Makholm

Re: complete clone of the debian website Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website Raul Miller
Re: complete clone of the debian website Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website Raul Miller
Re: complete clone of the debian website Mike Bilow
Re: complete clone of the debian website Raul Miller
Re: complete clone of the debian website Colin Watson
Re: complete clone of the debian website Mike Bilow
practical question on copying of our HTML code Mark Rafn
Re: practical question on copying of our HTML code Mike Bilow
Re: practical question on copying of our HTML code Raul Miller
Re: practical question on copying of our HTML code nitebirdz

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: complete clone of the debian website Ronald L. Chichester

Re: complete clone of the debian website Jean-Christophe Dubacq

Re: complete clone of the debian website Ronald L. Chichester
Re: complete clone of the debian website Jean-Christophe Dubacq

Re: complete clone of the debian website Ronald L. Chichester

Re: complete clone of the debian website Jean-Christophe Dubacq

RE: complete clone of the debian website Andrew Weiss
Re: complete clone of the debian website Chloe Hoffman
Re: complete clone of the debian website Chloe Hoffman

Re: complete clone of the debian website Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: complete clone of the debian website Chloe Hoffman

KDE libs Daniel Glassey

Re: KDE libs David Starner
Re: KDE libs Raul Miller

Would this be applicable to the API issue? Andrew Weiss

Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue? Mike Bilow
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue? Chloe Hoffman

Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue? Mike Bilow

Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue? Raul Miller

Re: Would this be applicable to the API issue? Chloe Hoffman

Re: [Debian] Majordomo will be removed (fwd) Julian Gilbey

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Debian] Majordomo will be removed (fwd) Julian Gilbey

Re: ITP: malsync Anand Kumria
Re: CMU Sphinx licence thread from January.. ferret

Re: CMU Sphinx licence thread from January.. Brian Ristuccia

Plan 9 is Open Sourced Juhapekka Tolvanen
license of smapi Martin Butterweck

Re: license of smapi Henning Makholm

Re: license of smapi Martin Butterweck

Re: license of smapi Henning Makholm

Re: license of smapi Mike Bilow

Re: license of smapi Henning Makholm
Re: license of smapi Mike Bilow
Re: license of smapi Henning Makholm

xmysqladmin- make can not find xforms.h Rafael Santander

Re: xmysqladmin- make can not find xforms.h Henning Makholm

Re: complete clone of the debian website (Joke?) Greg Fodor
outside USA giulio

Re: outside USA Henning Makholm
Re: outside USA Thomas Bushnell, BSG
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: outside USA Chloe Hoffman

new version of pilrc with strange license addition Ashley Clark

Re: new version of pilrc with strange license addition David Starner

Re: new version of pilrc with strange license addition Ashley Clark

Re: new version of pilrc with strange license addition John Goerzen

Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action Konrad Rosenbaum

Re: Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)

Re: Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action Raul Miller

Re: Fwd: Re: Liscencing Issue - Taking Action Joseph Carter

Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ? J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
KDE vs. Debian GPL-statements (Fwd: Re: proposal of a paragraph of GPL v.3) Konrad Rosenbaum

Re: KDE vs. Debian GPL-statements (Fwd: Re: proposal of a paragraph of GPL v.3) Joseph Carter

Re: KDE vs. Debian GPL-statements Richard Braakman

reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Andrew Lenharth

Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) James Troup

Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Andrew Lenharth

Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Marcus Brinkmann
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Marcus Brinkmann
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Wichert Akkerman
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Raul Miller
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Andrew Lenharth
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Raul Miller

Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) David Starner
Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Brian Behlendorf

Re: reiserfs-utils_3.5.19-1_i386.changes REJECTED (fwd) Andrew Lenharth

Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific) Andrew Lenharth

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific) Wichert Akkerman
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific) Martin Douda
Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific) Henrik Nordstrom

Re: (reiserfs) Re: License arguements again (debian specific) Henrik Nordstrom

[bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Brian Almeida

Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Brian Ristuccia

Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Nick Moffitt

Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Brian Ristuccia
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Brian Ristuccia

Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Tomasz Wegrzanowski

whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Josip Rodin

Re: whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Adrian Bunk

Re: whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] Josip Rodin
Re: whether there is a patent on MP3 decoding [was Re: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free] David Starner

[Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Joseph Carter

Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Chip Salzenberg

Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Tomasz Wegrzanowski

Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Chip Salzenberg

Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Brian Behlendorf
Message not available
- Re: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?] Joseph Carter

[OT] What does 'General Public License' mean? Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean? Henning Makholm

Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean? Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean? Raul Miller

Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean? Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? Richard Stallman
Re: Don't know if it can help... Colin Watson

Re: Don't know if it can help... Raul Miller
Re: Don't know if it can help... Nick Moffitt

Non-free license in included source Bolan Meek

Re: Non-free license in included source Anthony Towns

Re: Non-free license in included source Bolan Meek

Re: Non-free license in included source Henning Makholm

Re: hp2pbm_2.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED Camm Maguire

Re: hp2pbm_2.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED Henning Makholm

SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license James A. Treacy

Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license Henning Makholm

Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license sam th
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license Henning Makholm
Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: SGI Free SW license 1.1 compatability with Xfree86 style license Marcelo E. Magallon

The last update was on 13:14 GMT Sat May 11. There are 145 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc