Re: Possible copyright violation wrt SNNS
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 07:45:01PM -0500, RudeSka wrote:
> That is not correct. Qt has a similar restriction, however, I believe it
> is DFSG free.
While the QPL requires patch files to be used for source code changes, it
also allows you to distribute binaries built from modified source code
provided you meet a few conditions. It appears this is not the case with the
SNNS license, which allows you to distribute modifications as patches only
and makes no mention of an exception for binaries.