Re: Possible copyright violation wrt SNNS
That is not correct. Qt has a similar restriction, however, I believe it is DFSG free.
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 08:38:37PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 06:51:56PM -0400, Mike Bilow wrote:
> > I think there is no question you have to get it out of Potato as things
> > stand. You might be able to do something similar to what is done with
> > Pine, where there is a package that walks the user through an automated
> > patch-and-build-from-source procedure.
> >
>
> Or compile both the modified and unmodified sources and ship the unmodified
> binary with a binary delta patch.
>
> Either way it would need to go in non-free.
>
> --
> Brian Ristuccia
> brian@ristuccia.com
> bristucc@cs.uml.edu
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: