I feel that there may be a very real chance that the copyright holder might accept the changes into upstream. But I doubt it could be done in time for release. Torsten, have you had contact with upstream? Does this sound feasible? Other than that possibility, Mike's suggestion seems to me to be the best solution. Regards, Steve (Who really hates the thought of removing SNNS from potato..) Mike Bilow wrote: > I think there is no question you have to get it out of Potato as things > stand. You might be able to do something similar to what is done with > Pine, where there is a package that walks the user through an automated > patch-and-build-from-source procedure. > > -- Mike > > > On 2000-05-23 at 00:15 +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > > You are right :( It seems like I can't distribute the binaries created from > > the modified source. The license does not at all refer to binary distributions > > but I think I am in violation with the license here. > > > > This opens a release critical but on snns until that is resolved. If somebody > > from -legal agrees that I can't modify the source than we have to get this > > out of potato... > >
Attachment:
pgp_PmxqQKUyM.pgp
Description: PGP signature