Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL

To: maniek@beer.com
Cc: caspian@twu.net, bruce@perens.com, knghtbrd@debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 20:33:14 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199912050333.UAA02159@aztec.santafe.edu>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19991202220553.E410@priv3.onet.pl> (message from Tomasz Wegrzanowski on Thu, 2 Dec 1999 22:05:53 +0100)
References: <[🔎] 19991202062403.0914B1FF009@perens.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991202093805.10585B-100000@shell.twu.net> <[🔎] 19991202220553.E410@priv3.onet.pl>

    The highest priority task I see now is a web-browser deserving its name.

I agree.  What do people think of the W3C's browser as a starting point?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
  - From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>

References:
- Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
  - From: bruce@perens.com (Bruce Perens)
- Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
  - From: Caspian <caspian@twu.net>
- Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
  - From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the
Next by Date: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Previous by thread: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Next by thread: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread