Re: Open Content Licence is non-free?
* "Joey" == Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
[ opencontent license ]
Joey> The license is DFSG complient unless one of the two optional
Joey> clauses at the end are invoked. The text that references the
Joey> opencontent license will say if one of those terms is enabled,
Joey> they are off by default.
this is encouraging, but which two clauses do you refer to?
The package (Linux Administrator's Security Guide by Kurt Seifried)
uses these terms:
The OpenContent (OC) is defined as the set of webpages comprising
the "Linux Administrator's Security Guide" (located at
http://www.securityportal.com/lasg/) or the daily tarball snapshot
of said webpages, usually called lasg-snapshot.tar.gz. The
OpenContent license is available from http://www.opencontent.org/.
Terms and Conditions for Copying, Distributing, and Modifying
[ remainder as in http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml ]
I don't see any optional clauses at
http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml ... <confused>
PS: Thanks for the Cc:, I forgot to mention that I am not subscribed