Re: SNNS: does it really belong into non-free?
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 09:54:34AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> According to Joey the offending section is:
> 4. If you distribute copies of SNNS you may not charge anything
> except the cost for the media and a fair estimate of the costs of
> computer time or network time directly attributable to the
And he is right!
> In my understanding this doesn't say anything about charging for
> derived work not even about charging for installation nor charging for
> anything bundled with SNNS on the same media, but I am no US lawyer.
So what? Free means also I can take SNNS, burn it on the CD and sell it for
1000$. The above snippet prevents this.
Anyway, even if this were not the case, it *does* infect everything you sell
along SNNS. "if you distribute ...SNNS... you may not charge anything except"
This is as non-free as many other licenses of this sort.
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de, email@example.com PGP Key ID 36E7CD09