Re: LPRng in stable non-free or wrong man page?
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 07:42:12AM +0100, Gerhard Poul wrote:
> LPRng is distributed under the GNU software license for
> non-commercial use, the Artistic License for limited com
> mercial use. Commerical support and licensing is avail
> able through Patrick Powell <firstname.lastname@example.org>.
> This software should be in non-free. Maybe the license changed, but in
> stable it is contained in main.
There was a long war over this earlier. Many people felt that for xxx use
comments weren't normative, and it was just GPL/Artistic licensed.
Apparently either the consensus went that way, or no one cared enough
to do anything about it.
Oh, and this is going to legal, as that's the appropriate list.
David Starner - email@example.com