[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The APSL and Export Controls

On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Chip Salzenberg wrote:

> According to Jonathan P Tomer:
> > it is non free because it requires those who wish to distribute
> > modified code to perform a service for a particular entity, apple.
> So does the BSD advertising clause.

FWIW, it doesn't.  It restricts advertising, not distribution.

On the other hand, I don't consider the advertising clause free.  I just
consider it a necessary evil (we can't afford to chuck out all BSD stuff).


|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd	       |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |

Reply to: