Re: The APSL and Export Controls
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to Jonathan P Tomer:
> > it is non free because it requires those who wish to distribute
> > modified code to perform a service for a particular entity, apple.
>
> So does the BSD advertising clause.
FWIW, it doesn't. It restricts advertising, not distribution.
On the other hand, I don't consider the advertising clause free. I just
consider it a necessary evil (we can't afford to chuck out all BSD stuff).
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: