Re: The APSL and Export Controls
[Chip, you subscribed to debian-legal? Or do you only get copies if
they're explicitly mailed to you?]
According to Jonathan P Tomer:
> > it is non free because it requires those who wish to distribute
> > modified code to perform a service for a particular entity, apple.
Chip Salzenberg <email@example.com> wrote:
> So does the BSD advertising clause.
I'm not sure about the OSD guidelines, but Debian treats the BSD
advertising clause as an explicit exception to the principles underlying
our guidelines. It's not a precedent for anything we want to do: it's
something we'd like to get rid of.