Re: Postilion's Graphic Files Copyright
Marcelo E. Magallon writes:
> A fourth option (which I dislike because it's very treacherous) is to call
> the GPL into play. I'm sure that statement is not compatible with the GPL,
> is it?
No. However, to use the GPL there must be at least one author who objects
to the restriction.
> Now my question: doesn't this fall into the same messy kind of problem as
> documentation does? Does it have to follow the DFSG point by point?
> (Think 'modifications' please)
I think it would have to be a separate package for that to apply.
email@example.com (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill