Re: lprng license
Ben Pfaff <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I think you're obfuscating the meaning of that phrase. To me, it is
> clear that he means that you can use the GNU GPL if you don't need to
> incorporate LPRng into a commercial product.
As long as we don't have to be able to uphold our interpretation, I'd
agree that this is probably what the author meant and what he *thinks*
However, it's so badly and ambiguously expressed (e.g., all things
being equal, the phrase "the GNU software license" could refer to GPL
or LGPL or something third) that I think the package maintainer
should contact the author and ask for clarification.