Re: We distribute LyX?
Raul Miller wrote:
>
> David Starner <dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org> wrote:
> > Because LyX is under the same License as KDE - straight GPL. I
> > don't believe the quoted information from the webpage has any legal
> > standing. If it does, then it should be in /usr/doc/lyx/copyright, and
> > all /usr/doc/lyx/copyright is is a reference to the GPL. The reason I
> > quoted it, is I'm not sure what legal standing it has and it might be
> > relevant.
>
> If there's no bug report on this issue yet, please file one.
Bug report filed as of last night.
>
> Presumably either someone will fix lyx or the new Qt license will make
> the issue moot (at which point the bug will be closed).
Actually, LyX depends on XForms, so fixing Qt won't help. Fixing Qt will
let us add KLyX (LyX ported to Qt), which would be a good substitute.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Dullard: someone who, wanting a piece of information, takes down the
appropriate volume of the encyclopedia, looks up the item they need, and
then puts the volume away without reading anything else. - Peter
Dell'Orto, paraphrased from Philip Jose Farmer
Reply to: