On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 21:38 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > I never got any patch of you for our anti spam measures, neither do I > > got something from Dave. > > > > Alex - Debian Listmaster > > Patch? I think you've identified the problem. > > A start would be to tighten or remove any out-of-the box changes made to > spamassassin. Let's be clear, your current setup only set a score of 2 > for an email that: > > 1) contained a shortened URL > 2) was From: a freemail address > 3) fails SPF for outlook.it > 4) contains blacklisted received headers (ZEN, PBL, Barraacuda) > 5) promotes Instagram to a technical laptop discussion list. > > That email should have scored at least a 5 or 6 in stock Spamassassin > rules. We can give it a try, just for this list. But tbh, you have really no idea how much spam we catch. > > Further, email headers show you have Amavis with a threshold score of > 5.3 and Spamassasin with a threshold of 4.0. Which one will "win"? > > But really, you would be better served by just enabling some RBL checks > in Spamassassin and getting rid of Amavis. Getting rid of amavis wouldn't change anything. We would still call SA.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature