Paolo wrote: > 225 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 001 001 070 Old_age Always FAILING_NOW 3812632 A good example that a high load cycle count doesn't mean that your disk is required to die. That one is quite large and I am glad to hear that it is still working well. > with uptimes of months (always on, till it crashes/hangs ;) ) since - hm - > 2002. Or until the next kernel security upgrade is posted and you need to reboot into the new kernel. The 2.4 series "seemed" (subjective feeling) more long term stable in general than the 2.6 series has been in the last couple of years. I am sure that someone has already analyzed the DSAs to show the required reboot rates. :-) Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature