[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sony or Toshiba? (corrected)



On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 17:18 -0300, Carlos Felipe S. Pinheiro wrote:
> Hi. I was looking for a notebook I found two good deals: Toshiba Satellite
> A135-S4527 and Sony VAIO N220E/B, both for the same price (after rebate)
> $599.99.
> I wonder which one would have better Linux compatibility (and maybe better
> performance).

Hi Felipe,

If we cut those lists down to the parts that actually are different...

> *** Toshiba Satellite A135-S4527 *************************
> Processor Speed:	1.73 GHz
> Hard Drive Capacity:	120 GB
> 4 x USB v2.0
> 6-cell (4000mAh) rechargeable, removable Lithium-Ion battery pack
> Weight:	6.0 lbs


> *** Sony VAIO N220E/B ***************************
> Processor Speed:	1.6 GHz
> Hard Drive Capacity:	80 GB
> 2 x USB 2.0
> Standard Lithium-ion battery (VGP-BPS2A/S)
> Weight:	6.5 lbs


The Toshiba Satellite would seem to be a _clear_ winner.  10% faster
CPU, 50% more HD, 10% lighter, 100% more USB ports...

I'm not sure of the battery equivalences, but the Sony is unlikely to be
vastly different.

Other notes:

 - The card slots probably won't work under Linux, except to read SD (&
MMC?) cards where there are some under-development drivers that I have
had some success with on a different laptop.

 - You may need to install Xorg 7.3 to get the graphics running
properly, or perhaps use 915resolution (but really, Xorg7.3 is a better
solution).

Everything else should work OK.


Cheers,
					Andrew McMillan.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ  Ltd,  PO Box 11-053, Manners St,  Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/            PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)803-2201      MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN      OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
       The secret of being a bore is to say everything -- Voltaire
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: