Re: *** bluber *** Re: Male xxxxxx enhancement formula^
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:22:10PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Filter on message ID then.
> It does not work, because Cc: and Bcc: are faster then the List-Message
> and because I have seperatet folders, my List-Messages will never reach
> the Folder and I have a broken Archive.
Two different things. You use the message id to catch duplicates.
The for filtering into mailboxes -- some mail boxes I filter by To: or
Cc: header for the list and then all messages, even ones that come
directly to me via a cc: go to that list. Other lists I filter on a
header added by the list server. Then, if the CC codes in first, I
get that in my inbox. For many, but not all, their mail directly to
me is faster than the list. But I have no control over that.
> > One is that some lists I'm on have a delay -- it's been a while but
> > d-u has had periods of hours of delay. So the cc allows a response to
> Are you sure ? - I get the messages in less the 15 seconds back.
> OK, maybe because I am subscribed to <firstname.lastname@example.org>.
Sometimes the list is slow. There's been times when hours go by
before I see a response. Some of the gnu.org lists are that way too
once in a while. Yes, normally they are very fast.
> And what, if I do not check my "private" folder and waiting
> for a List-Reply for what I chech this Mailbox regulary ?
Why is that a concern of anyone else?
> IF I WANT CCs, because there is something of
> urgence then I set Mail-Followup-To: too.
Good. And hope they respect it. How much time do you want to spend
trying to get the rest of the on-line world to follow your wishes?
If you don't want duplicates then filter them out.