Re: ACPI and suspend
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 06:24:31PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, joris@linux.be wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:47:48AM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Alan Shutko wrote:
> >> > Derek Broughton <dbroughton@netcom.ca> writes:
> >
> > Perhaps a bit irellevant, but if you really want suspend to disk and
> > your kernel/machine combination doesn't support it, there is always
> > software-matic s. to disk. Don't know how smooth it works tough
>
> Can you supply any more details about this "software-matic" suspend to
> disk? The only thing I was able to turn up was the Software-Suspend
> code, by "Seasons", now maintained by Pavel Machek.
>
> This, of course, can't be the implementation you are talking about
> because you elided my entire post which was almost exclusively
> discussing that patch, right?
I'm afraid I was enlightened (awake?) enough to miss that
I originally found the link somewhere in one of the laptop-howto's, but now
I realise it was all about the same
*deeply ashamed*
Are there any reasons to prefer software suspend to disk above
bios-controlled, or backwards?
--
Greetings
Joris
joris@linux.be UIN: 25569167
PGP is currently out-of-use
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: