[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PCMCIA CD-ROM



Thanks for your reply.
cdctl tells me that there's an unsupported card in the socket, but I know it
is supported because it's listed in supported.cards and in pcmcia/config. My
problem is I don't know the correct way to edit the config file. If someone
could give me the syntax and where to put it I would be most appreciative.
I've read the documentation, and it's very vague on the CD-ROM's--or maybe I
just don't know what I'm looking for.


Thank you,
Marc

----- Original Message -----
From: Germano Leichsenring <germano@jedi.cs.kobe-u.ac.jp>
To: Marc Johnson <mjohnson@swales.com>
Cc: <debian-laptop@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: PCMCIA CD-ROM


>
> Hi, what do you get with /sbin/cardctl ident?
> If your card isn't recognized, the best (I think) is to
> put a device line on /etc/pcmcia/config (on my Potato)
> to set the right driver ( or try any of the available,
> I don't know if that's safe ) and cross fingers.
>
> >>>>> Marc Johnson <mjohnson@Swales.com> writes:
>
> Marc> [1 <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>] Is there a way
> Marc> to edit pcmcia.conf or cdrom.opts or is there a boot parameter
> Marc> that will make my EXP-940 CD-ROM get recognized as a
> Marc> CD-ROM. Right now it is being recognized as: "tty00 is a
> Marc> 16550A". My card is listed in pcmcia.conf, but in
> Marc> supported.cards it says that some work and some don't. I'm still
> Marc> hoping mine does. It gets power to it, opens and closes, and
> Marc> will spin up a CD, but that's it. I'm hoping there is just
> Marc> something I'm missing in the scripts somewhere.  I'm using
> Marc> debian 2.1 slink on a ThinkPad 755c
>
> Marc> Thank you, --Marc [2 <text/html; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
>
>
> --
> Germano Leichsenring
>   Kobe University
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>


Reply to: