[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DONE] wml://security/2019/dsa-4533.wml



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- --- ../../english/security/2019/dsa-4533.wml	2019-09-26 15:25:16.348802968 +0500
+++ 2019/dsa-4533.wml	2019-09-26 17:15:38.824567012 +0500
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="764f40879fe06378ede00881560b64a7832ec4a5" mindelta="1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопасности</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>It was discovered that the Lemonldap::NG web SSO system did not restrict
- -OIDC authorization codes to the relying party.</p>
+<p>Было обнаружено, что Lemonldap::NG, веб-система SSO, не ограничивает
+коды OIDC-авторизации отвечающей стороны.</p>
 
- -<p>For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 2.0.2+ds-7+deb10u2.</p>
+<p>В стабильном выпуске (buster) эта проблема была исправлена в
+версии 2.0.2+ds-7+deb10u2.</p>
 
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your lemonldap-ng packages.</p>
+<p>Рекомендуется обновить пакеты lemonldap-ng.</p>
 
- -<p>For the detailed security status of lemonldap-ng please refer to
- -its security tracker page at:
- -<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lemonldap-ng";>https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lemonldap-ng</a></p>
+<p>С подробным статусом поддержки безопасности lemonldap-ng можно ознакомиться на
+соответствующей странице отслеживания безопасности по адресу
+<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lemonldap-ng";>\
+https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lemonldap-ng</a></p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
 #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/security/2019/dsa-4533.data"
- -# $Id: $
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=lJgS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: