[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DPN 20/2012 frozen. Please review and translate



<hat type="l10n-english">

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:55:41PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2012-10-12 15:44, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> >Thanks to a
> >rewrite of the code, is now possible to merge older diffs together in
> >order to have a faster and more reliable final result: users now only have
> >to download two diffs instead of up to 56.
> s/is/it is/
> 
> >As usual, the Team would like to thank everyone who donated to the Debian
> >Project as well as Office Factory Fulda who hosted the meeting.
> s/Team/team/
> There should be a comma after "Fulda".

Too many commas, just s/who hosted/for hosting/

> >Stefano Zacchiroli sent his usual report of DPL activities for September
> >2012: among others things, Stefano continued his work on the relicensing of
> >the Debian logo, which is now
> ><a href="http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2012/2012-09-07.rtb.1/";>dual-licensed
> >under LGPL3+ / CC-BY-SA 3.0</a>.
> There are 2 Debian logos, only 1 was relicensed (see
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/10/msg00009.html for
> details).
> 
> >Christian Perrier noted that<a
> >href="http://bugs.debian.org/690000";>Debian bug #690000</a>  was reported
> >last Monday, just 3 months and 8 days after bug #680000.
> I don't see why we'd use "just" here.

Because the interval is trending down.

</hat>

> ><rcstats release="Wheezy"
> >	testing="443"
> >	tobefixed="246" />
> 
> The high number should currently read 496.

Meh. I'd rather hope the responsible team would update that number as the
DPN gets sent, seeing as it is rather fluid; there seems little point
quibbling about it at this stage...

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: