I like to contribute to the description of this package, but don't have
the time to do that right now. Maybe I can have a look next week if the
review isn't finished by than.
>>> Package: lcl-qt4${PACKAGESUFFIX}
> [...]
>>> This package contains the LCL and components Qt based backend.
>>> Actually this is an empty package but will not be in the future.
> where it now occurs to me that "actually" is probably a
> false-friendism for "currently". To make it possible to add on the
> extra layer of dependency-packageness later, I'll suggest:
>
> This is a placeholder package for the Qt version of the LCL, which
> currently just depends on the GTK version.
If I am not very much mistaken, the lcl-qt4 package is no placeholder
any more, so it needs proper updating.
>>> Package: lazarus
> [...]
>>> This dependency package depends on all packages needed to have a
>>> typical Lazarus installation.
> Er, but lazarus${PACKAGESUFFIX} claims to do that. This does
> something more complicated:
>
> This dependency package always depends on the latest available
> version of the metapackage pulling in all the packages needed to have
> a typical Lazarus installation.
dependency package -> metapackage? And I think it depends on either qt4
or gtk version right? Should that be considered?
Paul (who has *some* clue about this package)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature