[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dependency fields: Updated maint-guide contents, question on style



On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > In this text, I wonder the following part of text is a bit skewed.  What
> > is the subject of "should contain":
> > 
> > | These versions are listed in parentheses after each individual package
> > | name, and should contain a relation from the list below followed by the
> > | version number.  
> 
> "These versions" (or strictly speaking I suppose an elided repetition
> of the same noun phrase).  You're right, it doesn't really mean
> "versions" here, it means something like "versioned dependency
> expressions".

Yah, it made sense when reading in English but when translating them to
Japanese, I was bothered.  Now 100% translated :-)  (So is French close
to 100%.)
  
> > I am changing this to:
> > 
> > The restriction for each individual package is listed in parentheses
> > after its name, and should contain a relation from the list below
> > followed by a version number value. 
> > 
> > I hope this is OK. 
> 
> Yes, that should be clearer.  And there are a couple of examples... do
> you think maybe one of the examples should involve a "|"?

It can. 

foo2|foo

foo2 being preffered current one and foo being virtual pkg.

Osamu


Reply to: