[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: maint-guide: rule vs. rules



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Le 04/05/2011 00:59, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> Hi,

Hi Osamu, dle added, since I may have confused French and English
grammatical rules here.

Anyway thanks for checking closely my tiny changes, I tried to fix typos
spotted while trying to keep the translation up to date, but I may
indeed have misunderstood some meanings.

> In 4.4.1. Targets of the rules file:
> 
> | Every <filename>rules</filename> file, like any other
> | <filename>Makefile</filename>, consists of several targets and their
> | rules.  <placeholder type=\"footnote\" id=\"0\"/> A new rule begins with
> | its target declaration in the first column.  The following lines
> | beginning with the TAB code (ASCII 9) specify its rules.  Empty lines
> | and lines beginning with <literal>#</literal> (hash) are treated as
> | comments and ignored.  <placeholder type=\"footnote\" id=\"1\"/>
> 
> In here, I see you made a change to:
> 
> | The following lines beginning with the TAB code (ASCII 9) specify its
> | rules.
> 
> There are manu rules with different targets ... but I thought this is
> "its rule" since we are talking about "A new rule".
> 
> Am I missing something?

Since were are referring to “[t]he following lines”, I guessed there
might be more than one rule for this target. Now that you ask, I must
admit that one rule can be written in many lines, so now I have a second
though, hopefully Justin may be able to enlighten us here.

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=wVZS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: