On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > > APPENDICES > > ---------- > > A) another perennial, though it seems to use the wrong relative > > release names. > > This is because the release names where hardcoded here (instead of > using XML entities). Will fix. I've reviewed this and the appendix is correct but misleading. The release name was not hardcoded, it actually describes what to do if using the old release (lenny in this case) and it has not been upgraded to the last point release yet. I've adjusted the title heading to prevent confusion, but wording of this section could be improved. > > C) needs to go. > > True, will remove in the next round. Done. Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature