Quoting Christian Perrier (firstname.lastname@example.org): > > Lets get this package setteled first. I have no idea if it will have > > the same question text or even same debconf templates in a month or > > two. > > > In such case, I'd suggest to avoid marking the debconf templates for > translation when introducing them...but, anyway, now it's done.... so, > wouldn't it be good to "fix" the templates for the few very obvious > things we could: > > - avoid interrogative form in synopsis for ia32-apt-get/allowed-packages > - shorten the enumeration in that template to avoid multi-paragraph > that wastes space > - fix a few typography problems such as space before ellipsis and the > like > - drop possessive form ("your <foo> file") Goswin, have you made your mind about reviewing these debconf templates or not? We could do a quite basic review at first, just to allow a quick translation round, then maybe come back on these strings later if you happen to need changing them. Jonathan Wilshire seems ready to do such review.
Description: Digital signature