Re: Proof reading of a new debconf question
(Please CC me on replies, thanks!)
On 2009-02-25 at 08:35:35, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The weakness here is having the long description be in some way
> "dependent" of the short one, to get the full meaning.
That's a fair point. I wasn't really satisfied with my version either.
> Please choose whet[h]er you want to use SSL connections to
> the SMTP server.
> If you choose this option, data exchanged with the server will
> be encrypted.
One thing which I think is missing from this is the fact that not all
servers support SSL. Perhaps something like this would be better?
> If your server supports SSL and you choose this option, data exchanged
> with the SMTP server will be encrypted.