[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[LCFC] templates://sa-exim/{templates}



This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for sa-exim.

The reviewed templates will be sent on Sunday, February 22, 2009 to the package
maintainer as a bug report and a mail will be sent to this list with
"[BTS]" as a subject tag.


-- 


Template: sa-exim/purge_spool
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Remove saved mails in sa-exim's spool directory?
 There are some saved mails in subdirectories of /var/spool/sa-exim.
 Depending on the configuration, sa-exim may save mails matching specific
 criteria (such as "an error occurred", "rejected as spam", or "passed
 through although recognized as spam") in these directories.
 .
 Please choose whether you want to keep these mails for further analysis
 or delete them now.
Source: sa-exim
Section: mail
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), links, exim4-dev
Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.kibibyte.se/sa-exim/trunk
Vcs-Browser: http://svn.kibibyte.se/sa-exim
Homepage: http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html

Package: sa-exim
Architecture: any
Depends: ${exim:Depends}, spamc, ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf (>= 1.2.0) | debconf-2.0
Recommends: ${perl:Depends}
Suggests: spamassassin
Description: SpamAssassin filter for Exim
 SA-Exim integrates SpamAssassin filtering at SMTP time with the Exim
 v4 MTA. It may be used to reject incoming mails before they arrive, or
 even to tie up the sender's resources by slowing down the connection
 ("teergrubing").
 .
 Most of the functionality of this package can also be achieved
 using the exiscan ACL conditions built into the "heavy" Exim daemon,
 exim-daemon-heavy. Use this package if you need SpamAssassin's
 report_safe feature, or if you want to have easier control over the
 header fields added, without using the report template to add multiple
 fields.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: