Quoting Justin B Rye (email@example.com): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > I haven't checked closely but maybe dtc-xen templates are quite close > > to those from dtc which we reviewed recently. > > Is this version of dtc-xen/templates still up for review? Well, yes. The maintainer introduced many templates and most of them need a very solid review (just like the dtc templates were needing). Of course, what I usually don't check is whether the tempaltes are used or not. If some templates aren't used in the maintainer scripts, that should be reported separately as a bug, IMHO. > According to http://changelogs.debian.net/dtc-xen this package has > changed its installation behaviour, so the conf_info_finish_setup > template shouldn't still claim that it monkeys around with > /etc/sudoers and /etc/sshd_config (which was bug #402438). > > Meanwhile here are three l10n-english problems I hope the > replacement templates file can avoid: > -- "VPS Server", ie Virtual Private Server Server > -- using "network" to mean "network base IP address" - and likewise > "broadcast (IP address)", "gateway (IP address)" > -- "Physical console" used to mean a connection to a VM > > It also seems to me that dtc-xen is useless without /usr/sbin/xm, > which means the lack of "Depends: xen-utils-common" is a bug. I'd recommend a separate bug report here as well.
Description: Digital signature