James Westby added comments on the wiki. I think they deserve to be discussed on the mailing list (ML discussion is much easier than wiki discussion, imho). * [wiki:Self:I18n/DebconfReviewProcess Details of the process] + == Discussion == + + * Should we also review package descriptions while we are at it? When it is done we could approach the rest. Is there anything else we could review? + + * Should we consider using wotomae or similar to track the work? + - Reviewing packages descriptions would definitely be a Good Thing. After all, this is just about attaching another file (debian/control) -about work tracking: the l10n NMU campaigns were tracked down by a robot setup by Lucas Wall, in the past. The robot is mail-controlled. Indeed, tracking the mailing list messages could be done, as the messages are specially formatted. Thomas Huriaux might have some suggestions here. I was considering to ask around (targetting Thomas, indeed) who could setup a simple robot ranking packages by their popcon score and giving the status of review for each (which step, who is conducting the review, last status date and bug report status). I have no clue about what is wotomae. Could you give us more details?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature