[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Review of package descriptions and debconf templates

[Since this is -l10n-english and you've all beaten me to the substantive
review ...]

On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:21:06PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> [ I guess I should of used footnotes there.

"Should *have*", not "should of", please! The latter is a grammatical
abomination, which I can only assume is a back-formation from the
pronunciation of the contraction "should've".


Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: