[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[RFR] po-debconf://jed (3 strings)



Package: jed
Version: 0.99.18-5
Severity: minor
Tags: patch l10n

En een verse, zo blijven we aan de gang.
-- 
Vincent Zweije <zweije@xs4all.nl>    | "If you're flamed in a group you
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/>      | don't read, does anybody get burnt?"
[Xhost should be taken out and shot] |            -- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r.
# Debian jed po-debconf translation,
# Copyright (C) 2006 THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the jed package.
# Vincent Zweije <zweije@xs4all.nl>, 2006.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: jed 0.99.18-5\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: pkg-jed-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2006-08-11 00:49+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2006-10-10 19:56+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Vincent Zweije <zweije@xs4all.nl>\n"
"Language-Team: Debian-Dutch <debian-l10n-dutch@lists.debian.org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../jed-common.templates:1001
msgid "Remove old files in /etc/?"
msgstr ""
"Oude bestanden in /etc/ verwijderen?"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../jed-common.templates:1001
msgid ""
"Due to a bug in dpkg (#108587) the config files 00site.sl, 00debian.sl and "
"99defaults.sl in /etc/jed-init.d/ and /etc/jed.conf aren't removed after an "
"upgrade to 0.99.15-1 or higher."
msgstr ""
"Door een fout in dpkg (#108587) worden de configbestanden 00site.sl, "
"00debian.sl en 99defaults.sl in /etc/jed-init.d/ en /etc/jed.conf niet "
"verwijderd na een opwaardering naar versie 0.99.15-1 of hoger."

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../jed-common.templates:1001
msgid ""
"It seems you have modified one of these files, because their md5 sums differ "
"from the originals."
msgstr ""
"U heeft waarschijnlijk een van deze bestanden gewijzigd, want hun md5 "
"controlesommen verschillen van die van de originele bestanden."

Reply to: