Hi, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 01:50:33AM +0000, lumin wrote: > This is an modified update to zh_CH.po of package apt. > which is based on "1.1.exp6" TAG'ed version. (now the newest) Looks fine, expect a few minor issues: > # Chinese/Simplified translation of apt. > # This file is put in the public domain. > # Deng Xiyue <manphiz-guest@users.alioth.debian.org>, 2007, 2008. > # Tchaikov <tchaikov@sjtu.org>, 2005, 2007. > # Carlos Z.F. Liu <carlosliu@users.sourceforge.net>, 2004, 2006. > # Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com>, 2009, 2010. > # > msgid "" > msgstr "" > "Project-Id-Version: apt 0.8.0~pre1\n" > "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>\n" > "POT-Creation-Date: 2014-09-09 20:35+0200\n" > "PO-Revision-Date: 2010-08-26 14:42+0800\n" > "Last-Translator: Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com>\n" > "Language-Team: Chinese (simplified) <i18n-zh@googlegroups.com>\n" Could you please change Last-Translator (and the comment header above that as well) to reflect reality? :) > #: cmdline/apt-cdrom.cc:178 > msgid "" > "No CD-ROM could be auto-detected or found using the default mount point.\n" > "You may try the --cdrom option to set the CD-ROM mount point.\n" > "See 'man apt-cdrom' for more information about the CD-ROM auto-detection and " > "mount point." > msgstr "" > "从默认挂载点自动检测 CD-ROM 失败。\n" > "您可以尝试用 --cdrom 选项来设置CD-ROM的挂载点。\n" > "更多关于CD-ROM自动检测以及挂载点的信息，请参见‘man apt-cdrom’。\n" You have added an additional "\n" at the end of the message, which is detected as an error by our build tools (I see how this can happen, no problem and I could fix that myself, just doing full-disclosure here). > #: cmdline/apt-get.cc:245 > #, fuzzy, c-format > msgid "Can not find a package for architecture '%s'" > msgstr "无法按照正则表达式 %s 找到任何软件包" There are multiple messages marked as "fuzzy", which means that some tool has detected that the msgid changed slightly, but believes the msgstr could still apply and hence keeps it here for reference, but it isn't displayed to the user, so it would be nice if you could review these messages and either fix them and/or unmark them as fuzzy. I am not sure what you are using to edit the translation and I am not too familiar with the tools even if I would know, but I know that a lot of tools exist to help translators in various ways which could highlight these and other potential problems with the translation, so you might want to look into this as well. (Running a popularity contest on the other po files suggests that others are using Lokalize (previously KBabel), Poedit or virtaal – if they provide this type of information.) Best regards David Kalnischkies
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature