Re: [debian-knoppix] Re: e100 vs eepro100
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:18:01PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Marc Haber <email@example.com> wrote:
> > However, I have never seen an eepro100 chip that was not supported by
> > e100. That includes numerous on-board ethernet interfaces.
> Yes, my EtherJet100 also gets detected by e100 (at least
> it grabs it), but this card has the same PCI ID as my
> original Intel-cards have. So it seems, the driver does
> not check the Board IDs at least.
> However, there are PCI IDs in eepro100 that are not in
> e100 and vice versa.
Well, I'm trying to resolve this by looking at the sources. For those
PCI ids which are present in both drivers, I will use the e100 module
for now unless someone reports problems.
What about cards that have PCI vendor ids not starting with 0x8086,
like this one:
0x10c3 0x1100 "Samsung Semiconductors, Inc.|Smartether100 SC1100 LAN Adapter (i82557B)"
Such an ID is not listed in any of the two drivers id_table. I'm
using eepro100 for those cards for now.
debian-knoppix mailing list