Re: [debian-knoppix] Which UnionFS?

To: "Digital Infra, Inc." <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp>, Klaus Knopper <knopper@linuxtag.org>
Cc: debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org
Subject: Re: [debian-knoppix] Which UnionFS?
From: Fabian Franz <FabianFranz@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:44:46 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200401261944.46586.FabianFranz@gmx.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200401241615.AA00320@winxp.digitalinfra.co.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20040124161056.GH22140@linuxtag.org> <[🔎] 200401241615.AA00320@winxp.digitalinfra.co.jp>

Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2004 17:15 schrieb Digital Infra, Inc.:
> Hello Knopper.
>
> Thank you for quick reply.
> I am working on hacking about this FS now.
> so if I succeed to run it, please add my code to your list of candidates.

I presonally would _not_ use translucency, but use device mapper ...

Please search for "debix", there I have seen the most impressing union-fs, 
yet.

cu

Fabian
_______________________________________________
debian-knoppix mailing list
debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org
http://mailman.linuxtag.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-knoppix

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [debian-knoppix] Which UnionFS?
  - From: Klaus Knopper <knopper@linuxtag.org>
- Re: [debian-knoppix] Which UnionFS?
  - From: "Digital Infra, Inc." <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: [debian-knoppix] Next Knoppix: what's to be expected
Next by Date: Re: [debian-knoppix] Next Knoppix: what's to be expected
Previous by thread: Re: [debian-knoppix] Which UnionFS?
Next by thread: Re: [debian-knoppix] Which UnionFS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread