[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#667692: marked as done (crda: /sbin/cdrda and /sbin/regdbdump depend on /usr)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2022 06:02:26 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1n9hZa-0007Gj-Em@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1003903: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #667692,
regarding crda: /sbin/cdrda and /sbin/regdbdump depend on /usr
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
667692: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667692
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: crda
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: normal

ldd /sbin/crda shows:
	linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb76fe000)
libssl.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0xb769a000) libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0xb74ec000) 
	libnl-genl-3.so.200 => /lib/libnl-genl-3.so.200 (0xb74e6000)
	libnl-3.so.200 => /lib/libnl-3.so.200 (0xb74cd000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7370000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb736b000)
	libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0xb7354000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb733b000) 
	libm.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7315000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb76ff000)
and ldd /sbin/regdbdump shows:
	linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb771d000)
libssl.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libssl.so.1.0.0 (0xb76b9000) libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0xb750b000) 
	libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb73ae000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb73aa000)
	libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0xb7393000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb771e000)

Both commands depend on libraries in /usr. This can create a deadlock if
/usr is a network resource accessed through a wireless device which must
be regulated with crda.

The solution is to compile the two binaries with static linking, or move
the relevant libraries to /lib.

If, on the other hand, these two binaries are not intended to run before
/usr is mounted, then consider moving them to /usr/sbin.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages crda depends on:
ii  libc6             2.13-27
ii  libnl-3-200       3.2.7-2
ii  libnl-genl-3-200  3.2.7-2
ii  libssl1.0.0       1.0.0h-1
ii  wireless-regdb    2011.04.28-1

Versions of packages crda recommends:
ii  iw  3.2-1

crda suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 4.14+git20191112.9856751-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package crda has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1003903

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: