RE: [External] Re: Lenovo and Debian
- To: "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: RE: [External] Re: Lenovo and Debian
- From: Mark Pearson <mpearson@lenovo.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:31:15 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1bbcf89687f64497be3f5c6513aecf05@lenovo.com>
- In-reply-to: <0c28a17c58de1813040fc407a9802d8bbb20d102.camel@decadent.org.uk>
- References: <PS1PR03MB4828B224566624A3EAAB72E7C8B90@PS1PR03MB4828.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> <0100016cf892d4de-735ee9bc-b3c2-4559-8f55-6fe5bcf0912e-000000@email.amazonses.com> <PS1PR03MB4828765F76A9709455BF9428C8B80@PS1PR03MB4828.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> <61f7623805464298a1eab6d0fed162cb@lenovo.com> <tsltv9qdcn9.fsf_-_@suchdamage.org> <9c63424929dd20c68adfa2bc3b8394b751761db3.camel@decadent.org.uk> <4e862db546aa4e689b5e6a7e4ffef983@lenovo.com> <0c28a17c58de1813040fc407a9802d8bbb20d102.camel@decadent.org.uk>
<moving thread to debian-kernel list as requested - thanks Ben>
> In Debian unstable we will move to 5.3 shortly after it is released, depending on
> whether there are important regressions or integration to be resolved.
>
> Debian 10 "buster" will always have a 4.19-based kernel, but users can opt to
> install newer kernel versions from buster-backports.
>
As our customer wants a 5.2.9 kernel, I believe they will be using the buster-backports package for that (I'll confirm). If we want to enable the SOF driver and it's options by default are there any pointers about how I would do that? Is it just a case of pasting the CONFIG_ settings to this email thread or is something more subtle required (defconfig snippet etc)?
> > - Is there any solution available if we wanted to get the SOF fixes
> > into Debian Buster sooner. The SOF team have their own kernel but I
> > can track down commits where they pushed changes upstream etc.
>
> We're happy to take tested backports of changes that have been accepted
> upstream.
>
> That would include both:
>
> * Applying the fixes from 5.4 to our 5.3-based kernel for unstable
> * Adding the SOF driver to the 4.19-based kernel for buster
>
Got it - thanks. I managed to get the audio seemingly working in 5.2.9 with no driver changes needed (different firmware image) so I'm hoping (fingers crossed) I don't have to go this route but it's good to know it's available.
Thanks for all the help - I appreciate all the pointers.
Mark
Reply to: